
Michael Hawkins |
Georgia
DUI Success Stories
DEKALB COUNTY - .160 BREATH TEST - SPEEDING STOP
State v. B. M.
Defendant was stopped by Avondale Police at 3:30 AM for speeding,
given SFST's and arrested for DUI. Subsequent breath test registered
0.162 / 0.160. No legal grounds for suppression of breath test existed,
so Defendant hired Bob Zettl from Colorado to testify that although
the Intox 5000 is an excellent instrument, there can be several
reasons why its results might be inaccurate. In particular, Zettl
testified that Georgia's protocol was deficient in that a calibration
check was not performed at the time of each test, despite the ability
of the instrument to perform such a check along with each test.
He also opined that a burp or belch prior to the test could produce
an artificially high result, and the state's witnesses could not
exclude such a possibility.
The jury acquitted Mr. M. of both "less safe" and "per
se" DUI charges, and Judge Purdom fined him $100.00 for speeding.
Top
ROSWELL / FULTON COUNTY - .132 BREATH TEST - WEAVING / SPEEDING
STOP
State v. L.B.
Defendant was stopped by Roswell Police for weaving out of his lane
and speeding. After performing field tests, he was arrested for
DUI and blew a .132 on the Intox 5000. The officer failed to read
the implied consent notice in a proper and timely manner, so the
breath test results were suppressed. Since Mr. B. had a prior DUI
conviction, the State insisted on going to trial and introduced
evidence of the prior conviction to the jury. We argued to the jury
that Mr. B. was being prosecuted not so much for the present case,
but simply because he had a prior DUI, and the jury found him Not
Guilty.
Top
FULTON COUNTY - .23 BLOOD - WEAVING STOP
State v. J.S.
Defendant was stopped in Fulton County after he was observed crossing
the centerline, nearly causing a head-on collision with a truck.
Field sobriety evaluations, including the horizontal gaze nystagmus
(eye test), 9-step Walk & Turn, and One-Leg Stand tests were
administered. The defendant was arrested and asked to submit to
a blood test which resulted in a .23 blood alcohol level. At a pretrial
hearing, the State could not lay the foundation for the blood test
to be admitted, and the results were excluded from evidence. At
a bench trial, the prosecution failed to explain the meaning of
the horizontal gaze nystagmus test and the judge was not persuaded
that the remaining evidence proved that the defendant was guilty
beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant was found Not Guilty of
DUI and Guilty of Failure to Maintain Lane.
Top
CITY OF ATLANTA - .106 BREATH - UNLAWFUL TURN
State v. D.M.
Defendant was stopped by a City of Atlanta DUI Task Force officer
after he made an unlawful left turn at the intersection of Piedmont
and Cheshire Bridge roads. Field sobriety evaluations, including
horizontal gaze nystagmus (eye test), 9-step Walk & Turn, and
One-Leg Stand tests were administered. When asked to submit to a
portable alcosensor breath test, Defendant asked if he could have
a blood test instead. The officer would not give him a blood test,
but advised him that if he did not take the State administered breath
test, his license would be suspended for one year. Defendant took
the breath test, which resulted in a .106. At a pretrial hearing,
the judge excluded the breath test results from evidence because
the officer violated Defendant's right to additional tests of his
own choosing. The jury found Defendant Not Guilty of DUI and Guilty
of Failing to Obey a No Turn sign.
Top
CITY OF ATLANTA - REFUSAL - ROADBLOCK
State v. W.C.
Defendant was stopped at roadblock in the City of Atlanta. The officer
accused him of not stopping properly and ordered him out of the vehicle.
The field sobriety evaluations were videotaped, showing that Defendant
did not look nearly as impaired as the police officer described in
his report. Defendant was arrested and asked to submit to a breath
test. Feeling that he was not properly arrested, he refused to blow
and the officer filed a Notice of Suspension for one year. At trial
the jury saw the videotape. After deliberating for less than 20 minutes,
the Jury found Defendant Not Guilty of DUI.
Top
COBB COUNTY - .17O BREATH - ACCIDENT
State v. A.G.
Defendant was involved in an accident when he rear-ended the car in
front of him at an intersection in Cobb County. He was questioned
by the police about where he had been and how much he had to drink.
According to the arresting officer, he was unable to successfully
complete field sobriety evaluations. The officer read the implied
consent warning asking for a breath test. A wrecker was called to
tow Defendant's car, and the officer attended to other duties associated
with the accident. Some time later, Defendant was advised he was under
arrest for DUI. The breath test resulted in a .17. The judge ruled
at a pretrial motions hearing that implied consent warning had not
been read at the time of arrest, which is required, and excluded the
breath test from evidence. The prosecutor reduced the charge to Reckless
Driving and dismissed the DUI charge prior to trial.
Top
DEKALB COUNTY - .12 BLOOD - ACCIDENT
State v. S.J.
Defendant stuck a DeKalb County police car which had parked on the
shoulder of the ramp from I-285 East to I-85 South. The officer was
investigating a previous one-car wreck that occurred on the wet roadway.
According to the officer, when asked why he hit the car, Defendant
responded "because I've had too much to drink." Several
officers became involved with the arrest of Defendant and he was asked
to submit to a blood test, which resulted in a .12 blood alcohol level.
At a pretrial motions hearing, the State failed to produce any officer
to testify that Defendant was read his implied consent rights prior
to taking the blood test. The judge excluded the blood test result
from evidence. The jury acquitted Defendant of all charges.
Top
GWINNETT COUNTY - REFUSAL - SPEEDING
State v. S.A.
Defendant was stopped for speeding 72 in a 55 MPH zone. The officer
testified that he smelled alcohol when he spoke to Defendant. Field
sobriety evaluations, including the horizontal gaze nystagmus (eye
test), 9-step Walk & Turn, and One-Leg Stand tests were administered.
The defendant was arrested and asked to submit to a breath test. Defendant
asked to speak with a lawyer before deciding whether to submit to
the test. The arresting officer advised Defendant that he did not
have the right to a lawyer at that time and Defendant "refused"
to take the test. Defendant testified at trial that he would have
taken the test if he had been able to speak with a lawyer to find
out what his rights were. On questioning by the prosecutor, Defendant
admitted he had four beers at a sports bar earlier that night. The
jury found the Defendant Not Guilty of DUI and Guilty of Speeding.
Top
COBB COUNTY - .14 BREATH - WIDE TURN
State v. J.P.
Defendant was stopped by Georgia State Patrol for making a wide left
turn, given field sobriety tests, and arrested for DUI. Subsequent
breath test registered .14. At the motions hearing, no evidence was
suppressed, but it became clear to the prosecutor that the arresting
officer was very inexperienced and would not be a strong witness at
trial. The State dismissed the DUI charges, and J.P. pled guilty to
Reckless Driving.
Top
GWINNETT COUNTY - .15 BREATH - FAILURE TO MAINTAIN LANE
State v. P.B.
Defendant was stopped by a Lilburn police officer for weaving out
of his lane of travel. Field sobriety tests were administered and
defendant was arrested for DUI. Defendant submitted to the state
breath test which resulted in a .15. Background investigations of
the arresting officer revealed that he had an internal affairs file
that raised serious doubts about this officer's credibility and
integrity. Upon learning of this information, the state dismissed
the DUI charge and P.B. pled guilty to reckless driving.
Top
CLAYTON COUNTY - .093 - ACCIDENT
State v. L.B.
Defendant was involved in a traffic accident in the parking lot
of a bar at 1:00 a.m. She submitted to field sobriety tests and
an alcosensor. Based on her performance she was arrested by a member
of the DUI Task Force. She agreed to a breath test and blew a .093
and was charged with being over the legal limit as well as being
a less safe driver.
We argued at trial that based on her lack of manifestations that
Defendant was not impaired. In addition we argued that the margin
of error on the breath machine placed Defendant under the legal
limit. A jury found Defendant Not Guilty of all counts.
Top
CITY OF ATLANTA - .14 BREATH - FAILURE TO SIGNAL AND WEAVING
State v. A.G.
Early New Year's morning, Defendant was stopped for weaving and failure
to use his signal when turning into a gas station. After submitting
to field sobriety evaluations, he was arrested by a member of the
DUI Task Force. Defendant was taken to a nearby roadblock where a
Batmobile was located and blew a .14. The entire incident was recorded
on a video camera in the officer's police car.
Defendant brought Dr. Francis Gengo, a pharmacologist from New York,
to testify that based on the video he was not impaired and that his
performance on the field tests, his speech, behavior, and conversation
were inconsistent with a person with a blood alcohol level of .0 or
higher. In addition, the defense was able to provide evidence to the
jury that the breath machine had not been properly inspected under
the law. The jury found Defendant Not Guilty of DUI and Weaving. He
was found Guilty of Failure to Use Signal and given a fine.
Top
CARROLL COUNTY - .09 BREATH - SPEEDING
State v. R.S.
Defendant was stopped by Georgia State Patrol for speeding, given
field sobriety tests, and arrested for DUI. Subsequent breath test
registered .09. At the motions hearing, no evidence was suppressed,
but it became clear to the prosecutor that the arresting officer was
very inexperienced and would not be a strong witness at trial. The
State dismissed the DUI charges, and R.S. pled Guilty to speeding.
Top
DEKALB COUNTY - REFUSAL - IMPROPER LANE CHANGE
State v. H.S.
Defendant was stopped for crossing 5 lanes of traffic without using
a signal. While the officer was trying to explain the field sobriety
tests, Defendant became verbally abusive with the officer and used
profanity. Defendant was arrested for DUI. On the way to the police
station, Defendant urinated in the backseat of the patrol car. Defendant
refused to submit to a breath test. Although the jury felt that the
Defendant's behavior may have shown he was impaired, they felt the
State had not proven the case beyond a reasonable doubt. He was found
Not Guilty.
Top
|